Serving Kerr County with a Conscience

Wheatcraft

Center Point citizens have become aware of another attempt by Wheatcraft gravel mining operations to obtain a permanent rock and cement crushing permit for their HW 27 quarry site. The mining operator originally applied for such a permit in 2006. Indeed the rock crusher construction had begun without a permit but the Wheatcraft owners were forced to dismantle the structure when a knowledgeable neighbor requested a TCEQ (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality) investigation.

During the subsequent permit application process citizens organized into GREAT (Guadalupe River Environmental Action Team) and opposed the approval of the application. Wheatcraft already had the gravel surface mining operation in full production. The mined area along the Guadalupe River banks had become barren with the riparian area stripped of vegetation and only a few cypress trees remaining. The large amount of water being pumped from the Guadalupe for the gravel washing process was evident with a noticeable decrease in flow below the Wheatcraft river pump. Holding ponds required to contain runoff from the gravel washing process were not up to TCEQ standards and required revision.

GREAT members called attention to the health hazards posed by a rock crusher at the Hwy 27 location. Concerns were voiced over airborne particulates posing a health threat to the nearby Center Point school children and the high concentration of frail elderly. Prevailing winds could carry the contaminates several miles from the site.

If granted a cement crushing permit the old cement would be arriving from distant locations with unknown makeup and a high likliehood of toxic material content including silicone, lead, mercury and asbestos. Particulates from these toxic materials could produce an even greater health threat including cancer, skin and lung disease.

Over a period of months GREAT established its tax free status by aligning with the Texas Rivers Protection Association, hired legal council, prepared for the local TCEQ hearing and began maneuvering the legal system. Wheatcraft withdrew their application immediately before a court hearing after errors in their application had been revealed.

In the interim 5 years Wheatcraft has continued the surface mining of the entire highway 27 site with the results visible from Highway 27. Previous farmland, grazing and wildlife areas have been destroyed. There are no plans for restoration. This previously quiet pristine section of the river has been deserted by recreational tourists. Fishermen, floaters and paddlers prefer to avoid the dust, noise and barren riverfront. Wheatcraft has pumped huge amounts of aquifer water for their gravel washing operations in the area of the county at greatest risk for dry wells.

In 2008 Wheatcraft began operating a temporary cement and rock crushing operation. They have now applied to TCEQ for a permanent permit. GREAT members and local citizens met on Nov. 1, 2011 in opposition to Wheatcraft's application for a permanent permit. Concerns were expressed over air quality, river contamination at the site, contaminants settling in surrounding soil and runoff into the river.

The public can comment on the Wheatcraft application and request a local hearing. The communication must arrive at TCEQ before Nov. 17, 2011.

Download your comment form here. Fill it out and send it to the link below.

Below is the link to go online to send in your form:
http://www.tceq.texas.gov/about/comments.html

Below is the link to go online to see the facility site map for Wheatcraft:
http://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/hb610/index.html?lat=29.9436&lng=99.0183&zoom=13&type=r

Comments

Taxpayers Take Note!


Taxpayers Take Note!
You may soon be asked to pay for the cost of collecting data when developers are drilling privately owned permitted “public” wells in Kerr County. The term “public” just means that the well extends into the Trinity Aquifers. Up to now, the developer of the public well has paid for the data logging equipment usage and a geologists time to collect the data and submit it to the Headwaters Groundwater Conservation Board. Costs can range from $4000 to $6000. I believe both conservative and more liberal thinking citizens can agree that the developer, who will obviously benefit the most from a successful project, should pay for the data collection. Developers pay for other costs including streets, sewer, curb, park space, etc. that they recover from those who buy into or rent portions of their development.

Kerr County has one of the outstanding hydrogeological pictures of the aquifers and well water supplies of any county in Texas. HGCD has monitor wells in place paid for by taxpayer funds. They are monitoring several privately owned wells with the cooperation of well owners. The water in our deep aquifers may take 2000 years to recharge. We may now be in a 30 year drought cycle. Good science can help us manage our water supply. Present and new water users will pay to keep good data collection science in ongoing. Let’s have the developers pay to collect the data for new wells coming on line.

Mark your calendars for October 19(Hearing on Rescinding Rule 8.5) and November 9th(the HGCD Board will vote to Rescind Rule 8.5) I know that about 75% of the voters in Kerr County tend be conservative voters and desire to keep the individualistic entrepreneurial spirit alive. Now is the time to attend the above meetings and let the HGCD Board of Directors know that developers should pay their own way. If a $5000 data collection cost related to developing a $100,000 to $250,000 “public” well would nix a developer’s project then the developer should review the business plan. Spread over a 100 home project the cost is $50 per home. These seemingly minor costs passed to the taxpayer can result over time in less money available for your children and grandchildren’s education. Education in Texas is a better investment right now than providing more financial incentives to developers.

Gary C. McVey, Former Prec. 1 Director, HGCD

Comments

Open Letter to Kerrville Daily Times

Mr. Armstrong,


Thank you and the KDT for your continued coverage of water issues. I hope you will be able to correct a statement in yesterday's edition. Specifically, "restrictions imposed by the state on how much water the city can pull from the Guadalupe River have curtailed the city's safe operating capacity". Actually, there is almost no water in the Guadalupe River to pull. TCEQ only requires the city to maintain the same river flow out of Town Lake that flows into the lake during periods of low flow. During periods of above normal flow the city is required to simply maintain normal flow over the dam. There has been very little flow into Town Lake for months and the TCEQ cannot produce additional river water. The city of Kerrville has free access to all the water in Town Lake they simply must assure that the same amount flows over the dam as flows into the lake.

You should be aware that Charlie Hastings, Director of Public Works, has blamed the TCEQ's watermaster program for Kerrville water restrictions in previous years by promoting the idea that the city is being punished. Your article implies that untruth is being promoted again. The TCEQ (state) does not dictate anything beyond assuring the river continues to flow. I hope you will take a critical look at the facts surrounding river pumping and provide a factual analysis to your readers.

The Kerr County Conscience website provides historical data from the USGS gauges located along the river in Kerr County. I believe a brief check of this data is invaluable to understanding that our current river water situation is indeed a crisis which we cannot blame on the state. Click here to view this data.

Frances Lovett

East Kerr County

Comments

WILL GROWTH AFFECT OUR WATER?

By: Mike Mecke, Kerrville

Natural Resource Manager & Water Specialist – Retired


YES! It seems the destiny of Texas is to grow. We are exploding in population from within, from out-of-state – all together it is a very serious picture. Texas, for the most part, has limited water resources. Much of the growth is occurring along or west of I-35/I-37, which is a region known for frequent and often severe droughts. The semi-arid Central Texas’ Hill Country is where vegetation and climate from the East meets plants and climate from the West and the deserts beyond. And now, where old, largely German or just pioneer-settled towns meets tens of thousands of new comers…… us!

A high percentage of our new Hill Country newcomers came here from wetter regions or out of state. At least, that seems to be true in Kerr, Kendall and Gillespie Counties. Many of our younger or new Texans did not endure the Drought of the Fifties, as many older residents did. That intense seven to ten year drought (depending upon where you lived) was a character builder and a severe trial especially for Texas farmers and ranchers. Some turned to new irrigation afterwards. Many did not make it. You must read our Texas “bible” for those times by the late, great Elmer Kelton “The Time it Never Rained”. Elmer was at his best in that absorbing fifties novel of a family and a boy growing up and existing on a Texas ranch at that time. He makes you feel that hot, dusty drought and see the social conditions - they endure in your mind!

Growth and expanding population, home building and new businesses seem to be the main goals of most city officials, councils and the development community. That viral disease has seized even small town Texas and the Hill Country seems to be a major target area due to its beauty, climate, many rivers, springs and convenient location to major cities. We seem to be in the process of sometimes killing or destroying what we came here to enjoy and appreciate in these quaint small towns with their clear rivers, history and peaceful rural life.

The Hill Country and many areas of Texas cannot handle a lot of growth simply because there are not the water supplies to support higher populations, especially during prolonged, severe drought. Many new residents now want their homes and towns to resemble “back home” with large lush green landscapes, parks and golf courses. Years ago, water was not an issue in most cities and towns. Now it is!

There is little or no understanding of a term that is familiar to ranchers called“carrying capacity”. On a ranch or in a pasture, it means the numbers of animals, including livestock, deer and exotics, which can be maintained without damaging the desired rangeland vegetation. In good years and in drought these numbers will be managed to fit
the conditions. It is always limited by the production of desired forage and by rainfall.

2.
Mecke – Growth & Water


Personally, I think towns, cities, counties and regions also have a sustainable carrying capacity for people. Water is the limiting factor usually. There is a practical and ethical limit to how much water we can beg, borrow, buy or steal from adjoining neighbors without damaging either them or the environment. These issues are now facing Texans from Amarillo to the Rio Grande Valley and from El Paso east to Dallas, San Antonio or Houston.

Many areas of the state are now beginning to realize that our groundwater – aquifers– do not exist on county lines, so geographic groups of counties utilizing the same aquifers are forming Groundwater Management Areas (GMA’s). In Kerr, we are in GMA-9. This is an improvement in groundwater management and protection as people then work together to arrive at plans for water pumping and to derive a view of what they want their aquifer to look like in the distant future……maybe: the same as now, or wells averaging 20 ft. lower, or other standards? It is causing some heartburn for people in neighboring counties or towns with differing goals for their groundwater and their area’s growth. Some of us live in small towns because we like small towns. Others may want unlimited growth or financial rewards and would be happy to see a big city grow up in our Hill Country.

Too much well pumping affects groundwater levels and spring flows. This can be a disaster for our springs, creeks and rivers - especially in a long drought. All Hill Country streams arise from springs. Downstream bays and estuaries would suffer from reduced freshwater flow and nutrients. It is all connected isn’t it?

Excessive growth is becoming more and more important across the state as we continue to grow in often poorly planned or not well organized developments and communities. Get involved locally in water meetings. Texas needs to have smart growth. Water is NOT like any other “commodity” as there is no substitute!

Truly, Water is Life!

Comments

WHEN WILL TX PARKS & WILDLIFE STEP IN TO SAVE THE HILL COUNTRY’S WHITETAIL?

By Ann White for Kerr County Conscience


What I want to know is, since Texas Parks and Wildlife is supposed to be the agency that protects whitetail deer (they are owned by the state of Texas), when are they going to start protecting them? Anyone who owns property in this area should be able to see the writing on the wall: the day will come when there are no more whitetails in the Hill Country.

Like most greenhorns who move to Texas and buy a “ranch”--for us, 150 acres NE of Kerrville-- the realtor showed us a charming piece of land, with rolling hills, green grass dotted with live flowers, and majestic live oaks. All it lacked was bluebonnets to complete our art-gallery image of how beautiful it would be to live here.

When we saw our future ranch, it was lucky for the realtor that our viewing happened to be between droughts. We didn’t know then that the grass was momentary, that a development would be planned that would take all of our water, that all of our live oaks would eventually be wiped out by oak wilt, that we would soon succumb to “cedar fever,” and that our taxes would skyrocket. These are subjects for future articles! Now, in mid-winter and facing yet another drought, we are beginning to believe that perhaps the realtor’s greatest omission in his sales pitch was not any of the above, but his failure to mention a very serious problem facing all landowners—invasive species depredation.

One of the charms of our land was watching the wildlife, and for the first few years we were green enough to still exclaim over the elegant, plump, whitetail deer watching us from the meadow. Then one fall, some larger “deer” began to appear. These “deer” were often twice the size of our whitetails, and were much more aggressive. When cold weather came and forage for our whitetails was scarce, we began to put out a little alfalfa, a little protein, to help them make it through the winter. After all, someone had told us that whitetail live within 5 miles of the place where they were born, so these were OUR whitetail, and we felt responsible for them. But soon our deer began to look thinner and thinner and we started to find fawns, dead from starvation and exposure, on our road. We started watching our feeders.

Yes, all you Texas “Natives” out there already know about the escaped exotic, the axis, and the devastation they cause to land and native whitetails. But we didn’t know this, and no one told us. After a little research, we learned that “there could be over a million free-ranging exotics in the Hill Country alone” (Texas Parks and Wildlife Magazine, April 2007, page 38-39.) We discovered that axis reproduce at a much faster rate than whitetails (like rabbits!), and that they can eat grass, which whitetails cannot. So, after eating all of the whitetails’ traditional forage, they can switch to eating grass—therefore competing with cattle. And axis totally, in the slang of today, “kick ass” when it comes to feeding competition with whitetails. They will aggressively attack whitetails and run them away from the feeders, every time.

Soon, to our great consternation, we had HUNDREDS of axis exotics running roughshod on our land, eating everything in sight, and starving our native whitetail population. (Not only do they compete with whitetails--they also compete with all native wildlife that forages on rangeland here.) As our whitetails got skinnier, much teeth-gnashing followed. What was the solution?

Method #1: TRAPPING

We discovered that there IS no easy solution. Someone came to us with the idea of “trapping.” This involves draping a large, heavy net on poles, putting feed under it, then adventurous guys watch from a distance and when there are a lot of axis under it, “BOOM!” they let off a charge, the net falls, and—Voila!—they grab the axis, tranquilize them, and sell them to a ranch that is actually raising these beasts. Sounds like a good idea, doesn’t it? Well, it isn’t. First, it’s not only axis that go under the net to eat—whitetails go under it as well. Anyone who has observed the fragility of fawns’ legs and the whitetails’ overall propensity to be easily damaged can imagine the carnage that takes place after a heavy net falls on a whitetail and it struggles to free itself. How many whitetail deer are killed or mortally hurt in trapping? No one knows, because of course the trappers don’t talk about this—and the Game Warden usually isn’t around at these “drops”— or the landowner, either.

Trapping accidents can be fatal for whitetail deer, and there's no regulations protecting our native deer population.

It wasn’t until later, after watching whitetail for some time, that we began to speculate about whitetail damage during trapping. But then one spring an incident occurred that stopped trapping for good at our ranch. It was a hot spring. The net had been hung, and the feed put out. Then we had one of those brief, but intense, Texas thunderstorms and a quick shower. The heavy rope net became wet, and sagged. The rack of a large whitetail buck snagged the sagging net, pulling it down over about 14 other whitetail. All this happened, and there was no one around. That afternoon, the sun came back out, and the temperature reached a steamy 100 degrees. Taking my early evening walk, I approached the net and was appalled by the sight of the tortured, mutilated animals entangled there. This experience put an end to “trapping” on our ranch.

Method #2: TRANQUILIZING

Another friend suggested someone who came out and shot tranquilizer darts into the axis, then gathered them up and sold them, giving the ranch owner a small stipend. I discovered that there were also problems with this method:
  • The animals don’t drop immediately, and they have to be followed through often rough terrain. If there are holes in the fences, there’s a good chance that the animal will escape onto adjoining property and then cannot be retrieved. And there’s always the chance that the tranquilizing guys won’t be able to find the animal after they have shot it.
  • The men that do this focus on trophy animals or well-fed, healthy animals that will contribute to another ranch’s breeding stock. They don’t want ALL of the animals.
  • It takes time and effort for someone to tranquilize these animals, and it is hard work. The only way it pays is if there is a large population of trophy animals. Otherwise, the time consumed is just not cost efficient.


Since our goal was not necessarily to sell the animals and make money, but to GET RID OF ALL OF THE AXIS—to try to preserve the whitetails and our habitat--neither trapping nor tranquilizing were effective methods of control. At the same time that a few axis are being trapped and tranquilized (the axis soon know about the net and won’t go under it), mother axis are cheerfully having many, many more babies!


Method #3: HUNTING

As soon as we started talking to our friends about our axis problem, we were besieged by calls from people who wanted to come onto our land and “hunt” axis. Most landowners are particular about who they let on their land with a gun. Although sparsely populated, the area around us has other homes and businesses—easily within shooting distance. We have cattle roaming the entire acreage. We have farm buildings and parked vehicles. We had grudgingly come to the conclusion that the only way to rid ourselves of the axis scourge was to shoot them—before they starved. Then we planned on reinforcing all the fences and in the future planned to keep all deer, including whitetail, completely off of the property. We alienated about half of our acquaintances by picking one close friend whom we knew well, and knew that he was responsible enough to shoot on our property. One woman said to me, “Why won’t you let me hunt on your property?” My response was: “Why do you want to hunt?” Her reply: “For the sport.” I explained to her that hunting here was not for “sport,” that there was no “sport” involved. The animals were starving. They could be shot from the front porch. This was exactly the type of person that we didn’t want on the property: anyone infected with “buck fever.” We didn’t want anyone who was a poor marksman, or who would shoot without a clear shot, and wound the animal, and therefore extend its suffering. Exterminating the axis was a nasty, brutal, bloody, job. It had to be done, but that didn’t mean that we liked it.

Hunting has not worked, either. Our friend has been diligent and careful. But how many axis can one person shoot and give away? After shooting about 15, the job of gutting them became an interminable chore. Let’s face it; everyone likes the idea of walking to their freezer and pulling out an axis steak for dinner. But when it comes to having to gut, skin, and cut up a 500-pound animal—this is a job reserved for the real die-hards, the non-faint-at-heart. How many freezers can one person own? Now we are beginning to feel guilty about burdening our friend with this chore. On any given afternoon, he comes and shoots and fixes the fences—and a few hours later, by the time we put feed out for the whitetails, there are 50 axis that appear from nowhere and have it all eaten in 15 minutes. It’s hopeless!

We are beginning to resign ourselves to the fact that we can’t feed the whitetails without the axis stealing the feed—so we are going to be seeing our whitetails starve this winter, and our land totally devastated. While this is going on at our personal, micro-cosmic level, we are imagining what is occurring at the 2000-acre ranches. It’s a simple fact: the State of Texas needs to step in NOW and pass regulations dealing with the scourge of escaped exotic animals. These animals are devastating our state’s natural habitat, and the small, private landowner is simply not equipped to deal with the problem. As far as I’m concerned, it’s a good thing that Eddie Rickenbacker, the World War I flying ace who introduced these animals into Texas in the 1930s, has passed on—otherwise, he just might get sued.



ANN WHITE can be reached by email at our web site, kerrcconscience@aol.com. You are also welcome to leave a comment on this blog.

Comments

Show more posts